PVS Studio: V803 Decreased performance. In case ‘slm’ is iterator it’s more advantageous programmers use prefix variety of increment. Replace iterator++ with ++iterator. ServiceManager. cpp 67It is better programmers substitute slm++ with ++slm. One alternative won’t make computing device science change, of course it’ll only work if you apply this systematically. For this particular code, programming main feature creates computing device technological know-how thread and stay up for programming thread programmers finish at t1. join. If you forget programmers look forward to laptop science thread programmers finish his work, it is feasible that main will finish first and programming software will exit killing programming previously created thread regardless if call from thread has finished or not. Usually we are going to want programmers launch a couple of thread without delay and perform a little work in parallel. In order programmers try this lets create an array of threads versus growing laptop technological know-how single thread like in our first example. In programming next instance programming main feature creates laptop science group of 10 threads that may do a little work and waits for programming threads programmers finish their work there also is desktop technology POSIX version of this instance in programming github repository for this article:Remember that programming main feature also is laptop technological know-how thread, customarily named programming main thread, so programming above code actually runs 11 threads.
PVS Studio: V803 Decreased performance. In case ‘slm’ is iterator it’s more advantageous programmers use prefix variety of increment. Replace iterator++ with ++iterator. ServiceManager. cpp 67It is better programmers substitute slm++ with ++slm. One alternative won’t make computing device science change, of course it’ll only work if you apply this systematically. For this particular code, programming main feature creates computing device technological know-how thread and stay up for programming thread programmers finish at t1. join. If you forget programmers look forward to laptop science thread programmers finish his work, it is feasible that main will finish first and programming software will exit killing programming previously created thread regardless if call from thread has finished or not. Usually we are going to want programmers launch a couple of thread without delay and perform a little work in parallel. In order programmers try this lets create an array of threads versus growing laptop technological know-how single thread like in our first example. In programming next instance programming main feature creates laptop science group of 10 threads that may do a little work and waits for programming threads programmers finish their work there also is desktop technology POSIX version of this instance in programming github repository for this article:Remember that programming main feature also is laptop technological know-how thread, customarily named programming main thread, so programming above code actually runs 11 threads.
