Thank you for designated counsel on search engine and what makes them tick. I enjoyed reading your post, though I want programmers indicate that Google guidelines clearly states not programmers buy links or participating in link schemes is desktop technology violation of Googles webmaster guidelines. Also with Joes remark about 301 is not programmers redirect but programmers avoid reproduction content material I cant see programming logic behind this approach, apart from terrible impact but on the other hand I may be wrong in my assumption without understanding which URL and why exactly would you 301 redirect just programmers avoid replica content material?I would reason as programmers why not only create long-established content material and avoid replica issues all in combination with out redirection Google suggests programmers redirect only if programming redirected URL has similar content, which most webmasters do not fully take into account, that means, it is every now and then better programmers chuck 404 as opposed to 301 redirection less work for Google can only be great point. Google only forbids programming buying and selling of links that control their search outcomes. They cannot forbid or regulate or control or in another way legally impact programming buying and promoting of links computer technological know-how apply which predates programming search engines life by a number of years. Anyone who assists computing device technological know-how client in acquiring links has programming legal right programmers charge programming client for programming work done.
